Does having 20/20 vision mean that I have perfect eyesight?

Doctor's Answers 3

We usually measure vision by getting a person to read down a letter chart from top to bottom with decreasing sizes. Each line of letters is denoted by a number. 20/20 means one could see clearly at 20 feet what should normally be seen at that distance.

It is a term used to indicate normal visual acuity measured at 20 feet. If you have 20/40 vision, it means that you have to be as close as 20 feet to see what a person with normal vision can see at 40 feet. Note that the nominator is simply the distance for measurement, while the denominator represents the size of the target on a calibrated letter chart.

Visual acuity only indicates the clarity of vision at a designated distance. Having a 20/20 vision does not necessarily imply perfect eyesight as there are other visual aspects including contrast sensitivity, visual field function, eye coordination, depth perception, colour vision, etc.

For instance, a person with hyperopia (far-sightedness) may see 20/20 or even better at distance but not so for near tasks. Another person with cataract may still be able to see 20/20 but with an impaired contrast sensitivity.

Therefore, a more detailed and comprehensive eye examination would be required before we can draw any conclusions.

Vision is usually recorded by having a person read a chart of various letters, which vary from being large at the top to small at the bottom.

Near the bottom of the chart, there is a line of letters called the 20/20 or 6/6 line. More precisely, each element of a letter on this line (eg the width of the vertical part of the letter T) subtends an angle of a minute of arc at the nodal point of the eye.

20/20 or 6/6 vision merely means someone can read the letters on this line of the chart.

It can also be taken to mean that what a person with 'normal' vision can see at 20 feet (6 meters), the person being tested can also see at the same 20 feet (6 meters). In other words, 20/20 or 6/6 vision means 'normal vision'.

Note that testing vision in this way can be done with or without glasses.

Therefore 20/20 without glasses could be commonly considered 'perfect vision/eyesight'. On the other hand, 20/20 with glasses means that vision is normal, but only while wearing glasses-ie that there is significant focusing issues/refractive error affecting vision, but that once that is corrected with lenses the small letters can be seen as well.

Some people may also be able to make out the 20/20 letters even though they have slight blurring or a very small amount of refractive error/aberrations. In other words, someone's 20/20 may be a bit different from someone else's 20/20. Also, some people can see even better than 20/20, eg 20/15 or 20/10. So is it possible to be better than perfect? That depends on a person's definition of perfect.

As you can see, when specifying someone's vision/visual acuity, a few extra things (besides the Snellen number) need to be mentioned to really know how good someone's vision is. But at the most basic level, 20/20 means pretty good vision.

Photo of Dr Natasha Lim
Dr Natasha Lim

Ophthalmologist

Yes

Similar Questions

How to treat persistent blisters on the hands due to dyshidrotic eczema?

Thanks for the question. Dyshidrotic eczema is a form of eczema that presents as tiny bubbles on the hands and feet. The rash is often itchy and the tiny bubbles can become more confluent to form larger blisters. The rash can also be painful when the blisters burst and there are raw areas of skin. It is important to avoid harsh soap and detergents and irritants as this can further aggravate the rash. Topical steroids and moisturizers are often prescribed to reduce the inflammation and control the eczema. This should be able to control the eczema in most cases.

Photo of Dr Colin Theng

Answered By

Dr Colin Theng

Dermatologist

As compared to LASIK patients, why do Epi-LASIK patients tend to have residual degree instead of perfect eyesight after surgery?

Actually, the basis of your question ie that epi-LASIK patients tend to have residual degree as compared to LASIK patients is not necessarily true. For example, in this Cochrane Database Review meta-analysis comparing LASIK with PRK (which is the same as epi-LASIK) https://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/23440799, the authors concluded that 'The two techniques appear to give similar outcomes one year after surgery.

Photo of Human

Answered By

Human

Ask any health question for free

I’m not so sure about a procedure...

Ask Icon Ask a Question

Join Human

Sign up now for a free Human account to get answers from specialists in Singapore.

Sign Up

Get The Pill

Be healthier with our Bite-sized health news straight in your inbox